<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Campaign to keep Parliament transparent</title>
	<atom:link href="http://parlezvousmoo.com/2009/01/21/campaign-to-keep-parliament-transparent/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://parlezvousmoo.com/2009/01/21/campaign-to-keep-parliament-transparent/</link>
	<description>A nutty cow starts a new life abroad</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 01:19:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dungeekin</title>
		<link>http://parlezvousmoo.com/2009/01/21/campaign-to-keep-parliament-transparent/#comment-1413</link>
		<dc:creator>Dungeekin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 11:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://parlezvousmoo.com/?p=529#comment-1413</guid>
		<description>This seems to be creating a lot of interest, which can only be a good thing.

The latest news indicates that the Tories are three-line whipping to vote against the legislation, and so are the Lib Dems, which just leaves Labour voting for. 

I can understand them &lt;a href=&quot;http://dungeekin.blogspot.com/2009/01/government-to-revise-mp-expenses.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;not wanting transparency&lt;/a&gt; - after all, I doubt they&#039;d want Mandelson&#039;s expense claims made public!

D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This seems to be creating a lot of interest, which can only be a good thing.</p>
<p>The latest news indicates that the Tories are three-line whipping to vote against the legislation, and so are the Lib Dems, which just leaves Labour voting for. </p>
<p>I can understand them <a href="http://dungeekin.blogspot.com/2009/01/government-to-revise-mp-expenses.html" rel="nofollow">not wanting transparency</a> &#8211; after all, I doubt they&#8217;d want Mandelson&#8217;s expense claims made public!</p>
<p>D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

